Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Report Abuse   |   Sign In   |   Register
Community Search

Search »
Featured Members
Judi Miller, Kansas State Department of EducationPresident of the National Title I Association
Cory Green, Texas Education Agency2011 National Title I Conference Chair

Legislative & Policy Updates
National Title I Association Executive Director for Government Relations, Rich Long, provides ongoing insights into the legislative and policy processes around Title I.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Funding  ESEA  NCLB  AYP  Ed Reform  LEARN Act  legislation  literacy  partnership  Reauthorization  Senate  SETDA  technology 

Rewriting of ESEA

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, 19 hours ago

What is the status of reauthorization as the Congress moves into its last days to be in session before the elections?  Since June the expectation has been that the House Committee on Education and Labor was going to make public a draft staff has been working on.  Now, with at least some sections in draft, the question will move to the agenda of a "members-only" meeting sometime soon (week of September 13th - as the members come back to DC for the final weeks of the session).  Some have heard that Chairman Miller would like to move a bill or make public a Democratic plan.  However, several Democrats on the committee would like to avoid taking on any controversial issues related to reauthorization so close to the elections.  In the Senate, the committee staff, who has also been working on drafting sections of the measure and holding meetings on over 19 separate issues well into July, is giving all indications that there draft will be released early in 2011.  Clearly, as the members come back to Washington for the final three to four legislative weeks decisions are going to be made.

One of the wildcards in the deck will be the outcome of the election.  It is possible that the Congress will be called back to a lame-duck session but the question will be how much of an agenda will be pushed.  One of the bell weather issues to determining if there will be a lame-duck session will be if the appropriations process is completed (not likely) or if there will be a long-term (past January 3rd) continuing resolution.

 

Tags:  ESEA  NCLB  Reauthorization 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Washington Post - three books on ed reform

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Wednesday, August 25, 2010

From the Washington Post Sunday August 22, 2010 page B7

Three books about education reform http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/20/AR2010082002083.html
Washington Post
By Diane Ravitch

Sunday, August 22, 2010; B07

Now that the Obama administration has invited the states to compete for $5 billion in stimulus funds, the winners will not be those that come up with the best reform ideas, but those that agree to do what the administration wants: create privately managed charter schools, evaluate teachers by their students' test scores, and close low-performing schools. Since so much power and money are arrayed on one side of the issue, it is useful to consider some dissenting views. These three books have the power to change the national discussion of what now passes for "school reform."
1 Linda Darling-Hammond's "The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future"(Teachers College, $21.95) contains a valuable lode of practical and research-based advice about how to improve our schools. Darling-Hammond does something that the Obama administration has failed to do: She reviews what the top-performing school systems around the world do to get great results. Their highest priorities, she shows, are building a strong, experienced staff and making sure that every school has access to a rich, well-balanced curriculum in the arts and sciences. Finland, the highest-performing nation, has not relied on testing and accountability to achieve its current status.
2 Barbara Torre Veltri's "Learning on Other People's Kids: Becoming a Teach for America Teacher" (Information Age; $29.99, paper). If American education has a sacred cow, it is Teach for America, which recently won $50 million from the U.S. Department of Education. The organization recruits bright college graduates to work for two years in the nation's poorest schools. Veltri has taught many of these recruits in her job at the University of Arizona, and she interviewed hundreds for this book. While she admires the young people who join the program, she raises important questions about the value of placing unprepared teachers in classes with the nation's neediest children.
3 If I were assigning reading to staff members at the U.S. Department of Education, I would ask them to study Richard Rothstein's "Grading Education: Getting Accountability Right" (Teachers College and Economic Policy Institute; $19.95, paper). Rothstein and his colleagues explain in plain language why current accountability policies, which focus only on basic skills, are making education worse, not better, by narrowing the curriculum. With apt examples, they also show how the pursuit of numbers distorts more important goals and how schools may get higher test scores without supplying better education.
Diane Ravitch is a former assistant secretary of education. Her latest book is "The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education."

Tags:  Ed Reform 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

House Ed Committee to hold hearings on Turnaround Companies

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The following was announced today - most likely this will be one of several strands we will see Chairman Miller use to discuss key issues - before the election.

 

Chairman Miller Announces Hearing to Review School Turnaround Companies
August 18, 2010 12:31 PM

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Rep. George Miller (D-CA), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee today announced plans for a hearing to review companies who contract with school districts to help improve schools.
"Failing schools affect not only students and teachers, but entire communities. Turning around low achieving and persistently failing schools requires critical attention, resources, flexibility and planning for success – and keeping a close eye on the needs of the students and the community. In recent hearings, we’ve heard from expert witnesses and high quality providers with the skills and expertise to help turn around schools.

"However, with increased focus on school reform under this administration, it seems some companies with little or no expertise in education are purporting to be experts in school turnaround to try and take advantage of available federal money. Companies who are hired to help turn around schools as partners should have the best expertise and the best qualifications. I plan to hold a hearing and use the committee’s oversight authority to investigate the process of hiring providers to help turn around schools.”

The Education and Labor Committee has held several hearings looking at best practices for turning around low performing schools.

More information about school turnaround hearings
# # #

Tags:  AYP  ESEA  NCLB 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

House passes Ed Jobs Bill

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Updated: Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Today, August 10th the House passed the $10 billion Education Jobs bill by a vote of 247-161.  This measure was passed by the Senate last week and now goes to the President for an expected signature.  The White House estimates that over 160,000 jobs will be saved by this measure.  Funds are required to flow to the states with 45 days of enactment.

Attached is an updated state by state chart of amount of funds and number of jobs impacted.

 

 Attached Files:

Tags:  Funding 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

$10 billion state fund for teachers jobs

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Thursday, August 05, 2010

On Wednesday August 4th, the Senate voted to close debate on a supplemental funding bill that would provide states with $26 billion for teacher ($10 billion) and other government funded jobs.  On August 5th the final vote should take place.  The measure then goes to the House for a final vote, this vote is now scheduled for August 10th.  The House is coming back from it's summer recess. 

Additionally, the Committee for Education Funding is requesting information on how this additional funding will positively impact schools and children.  The estimate is that this will cover 140,000 teachers or other school based jobs.  If you have data, and would like to share it, please send it to richlong@titlei.org.

 

 

 

Tags:  Funding 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Senate Appropriations Report Language on Education of the Disadvantaged

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Tuesday, August 03, 2010
Senate Appropriation Committee: EDUCATION FOR THE DISADVANTAGED

Appropriations, 2010 $15,914,666,000
Budget estimate, 2011 15,883,434,000
Committee recommendation 16,726,579,000

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $16,726,579,000 for education for the disadvantaged. The budget request is $15,883,434,000. The fiscal year 2010 appropriation is $15,914,666,000.

The President's budget for fiscal year 2011 was based on the administration's proposal to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA]. While the authorizing committees have taken significant actions to reauthorize the act, legislation has not yet passed the Senate. As a result, the Committee bill is based on current law for programs authorized under the ESEA.

The programs in the Education for the Disadvantaged account help ensure that poor and low-achieving children are not left behind in the Nation's effort to raise the academic performance of all children and youth. Funds appropriated in this account primarily support activities in the 2011-2012 school year.

Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Title I grants to local educational agencies [LEAs] provide supplemental education funding, especially in high-poverty areas, for local programs that provide extra academic support to help raise the achievement of eligible students or, in the case of schoolwide programs, help all students in high-poverty schools meet challenging State academic standards.

The Committee recommends $14,942,401,000 for this program. The budget request was $14,492,401,000, which was the same amount as the fiscal year 2010 appropriation. Title I grants are distributed through four formulas: basic, concentration, targeted, and education finance incentive grant [EFIG].

For title I basic grants, including up to $4,000,000 transferred to the Census Bureau for poverty updates, the Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,597,946,000. This amount is the same as the budget request and the fiscal year 2010 appropriation.

For concentration grants, the Committee recommends $1,365,031,000. This amount is the same as the budget request and the fiscal year 2010 level.

For grants through the targeted formula, the Committee recommends $3,489,712,000. The budget request and the amount in the fiscal year 2010 appropriations bill are $3,264,712,000.

Finally, for grants through the EFIG formula, the Committee recommends $3,489,712,000. The budget request and the amount in the fiscal year 2010 appropriations bill are $3,264,712,000.

Of the funds available for title I grants to LEAs, up to $4,000,000 shall be available on October 1, 2010, not less than $3,145,801,000 will become available on July 1, 2011, and $10,841,176,000 will become available on October 1, 2011. The funds that become available on July 1, 2011, and October 1, 2011, will remain available for obligation through September 30, 2012.

Early Learning Challenge Fund

The Committee recommendation includes $300,000,000 for a new Early Learning Challenge Fund, as authorized in section 308 of this act. The budget request did not include funding for this activity. These funds are available for obligation from July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012.

There is robust evidence that high-quality early learning programs help children develop the cognitive, social, emotional, and language skills needed to succeed in school and later in life. Lasting effects are well documented and include improved academic achievement, reduced need for special education, increased employment and earnings, and reduced instances of crime and delinquency. Yet quality varies greatly across settings, within States, and across the Nation, and the most disadvantaged children are often left behind.

The Early Learning Challenge Fund will provide competitive grants to States to develop and implement integrated systems of high-quality early learning programs. States should promote high standards of quality and focus on outcomes across early learning settings, including pre-kindergarten, child care, and Head Start programs, with the goal of increasing the number of disadvantaged children ages 0 to 5, including those who are low-income, homeless, developmentally delayed, or have limited English proficiency, in these programs.

The Secretary of Education shall jointly develop policy for and administer these grants with the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The Committee directs the Departments of Education and HHS to provide a joint briefing to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and House of Representatives within 30 days of issuing the grant announcement for this program.

William F. Goodling Even Start Family Literacy Program

The Committee recommends no funding for the Even Start program, as did the budget request. The fiscal year 2010 appropriation is $66,454,000.

The Even Start program provides grants for family literacy programs that serve disadvantaged families with children under 8 years of age and adults eligible for services under the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act.

The Committee notes that three national evaluations have found that this program did not effectively increase the literacy skills of children and parents participating in the program. The Committee strongly believes that investments in early learning are critical and that's why the bill includes $300,000,000 for the early learning challenge fund discussed previously, as well an increase of $990,000,000 for Head Start and $1,000,000,000 for the Child Care and Development block grant program.

School Improvement Grants

The Committee recommendation includes $625,000,000 for the School Improvement Grants program. The budget request is $900,000,000 and the fiscal year 2010 appropriation is $545,633,000.

The Committee continues language from the fiscal year 2010 act that addresses several issues. First, it continues the expansion of the number of schools that may receive funds through the program. This language allows schools to be eligible if they are title I-eligible and have not made adequate yearly progress for at least 2 years or are in the State's lowest quintile of performance based on proficiency rates. Second, language also allows States to make subgrants of not more than $2,000,000 to each participating school.

The Committee bill also includes language that specifies that each State that receives School Improvement Grants funds must spend 40 percent of its allocations on school improvement activities in middle and high schools, unless the State educational agency determines that all targeted middle and high schools can be served with a lesser amount. Preliminary indications suggest that many of the lowest-performing high schools will not be served under the current structure of the program. That is a problem because over one-half of the Nation's dropouts come from nearly 2,000 low-performing high schools, and nearly one-third of them aren't eligible for School Improvements under the current structure of the program.

The Committee requests that the Department assist States in encouraging and supporting LEAs in their use of school improvement funds, including those made available through the 4 percent set aside established in section 1003(a) of the ESEA, on those activities with evidence bases rated strong or moderate as defined in the regulations for the Investing in Innovation program. While the Committee acknowledges that the state of research on school improvement and school turnaround is not as strong as it needs to be, every effort should be made to utilize the knowledge base that does exist while additional research is conducted that will inform future activities. The Committee expects the Department to describe in the fiscal year 2012 congressional budget justification specific actions taken or planned to address this request.

Striving Readers

The Committee recommends $250,000,000 to continue the Striving Readers initiative. This amount is the same as the fiscal year 2010 appropriation. The budget proposes to consolidate this funding within a new Effective Teaching and Learning program under its reauthorization proposal.

The Committee bill includes language that continues this program as it was established in the fiscal year 2010 appropriations act. This comprehensive literacy program will advance literacy skills, including language development, reading and writing for all students, including English language learners and students with disabilities, from birth through grade 12.

Of the total amount, up to $21,000,000 may be used to continue an adolescent literacy initiative and $10,000,000 will be distributed by formula to States to support a State literacy team. After funds are set aside for schools funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and for the outlying areas, up to 5 percent of the remaining funds may be used for national activities, and the rest would be used for competitive grants to State educational agencies. States will be required to distribute not less than 95 percent of their funds as subgrants to LEAs or, in the case of early literacy, to LEAs or other entities providing early childhood care and education. State subgrants must first be prioritized to such agencies or other entities serving greater percentages or numbers of disadvantaged students and ensure that: at least 15 percent go to serve children from birth through age 5, 40 percent to serve students in kindergarten through grade 5, and 40 percent to serve students in middle and high school, through grade 12. States also must equitably distribute funds between middle and high schools.

Tags:  Funding  Senate 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Notes on Senate Hearing on Children

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Tuesday, August 03, 2010

National Title I Association Notes from U.S. Senate Hearing July 29, 2010

The State of the American Child: The Impact of Federal Policies on Children

Senators Dodd, Merkley, Casey were present.

Senator Dodd noted that he will introduce legislation to, each year, have the National Commission on Children (establish 20 years ago) take a look at the status of children and families in the US and outline promising new directions for policy and programs. Dodd also emphasized the need to have all agencies share information and work together.

Witnesses:

¨ Cecilia Rouse, PhD , Member, Council of Economic Advisers, Washington, DC

Delineated state of children, 2010: dental, asthma, depressions and obesity on the rise.

On education she commented:

"In the most recent tests, only 32 percent of 8th graders were proficient in reading and only 34 percent in math, where a student is deemed "proficient” if he or she demonstrates age- or grade-appropriate competency over challenging subject matter and shows an ability to apply knowledge to real world situations.”

On work needed to strengthen the education and training of American workers:

"… it is important to emphasize that the task of improving later educational outcomes begins before elementary school. School readiness which involves both cognitive skills – as measured by vocabulary size, complexity of spoken language, and basic counting – and social and emotional skills – such as the ability to follow directions and self-regulate – is critical to later educational and labor market success. Children who arrive at kindergarten without these skills lack the foundation on which later learning will build. And yet relatively recent research indicates that as many as 45 percent of entering kindergarteners are ill-prepared to succeed in school. Because investments in the youngest members of U.S. society generate better-prepared students and healthier workers that earn higher wages, economists have estimated that the long-run benefits outweigh the costs of a high-quality pre-school. Steven W. Barnett and Leonard N. Masse estimate that a dollar investment in one program produced $2.50 in long-run savings for taxpayers. James Heckman, Nobel Laureate in Economics, and his colleagues estimated even higher savings of $7 from another program.”

On World-Class Education:

"… competitiveness of the U.S. economy depends on the productivity of its workers. A

growing share of jobs requires workers with greater analytical and interactive skills, which are

typically acquired with some post-secondary education. And yet students cannot succeed in

post-secondary education and training programs if they are ill-prepared. While the current U.S.

education and training system has been shown to provide valuable labor market skills to

participants, it could be more effective at encouraging completion and responding to the needs of the labor market. As detailed in the CEA report, "Preparing the Workers of Today for the Jobs of Tomorrow,” a comprehensive strategy must include a solid early childhood, elementary, and secondary system that ensures students have strong basic skills; institutions and programs that have goals that are aligned and curricula that are cumulative; close collaboration between

training providers and employers to ensure that curricula are aligned with workforce needs;

flexible scheduling, appropriate curricula, and financial aid designed to meet the needs of

students; and incentives for institutions and programs to continually improve and innovate; and

accountability for results.

"The Federal government's investments in these areas have moved in the right direction

particularly with some of the innovative investments in the ARRA and the Health Care and

Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. The Reauthorizations of the Elementary and Secondary

Education Act of 1965 and the Workforce Investment Act will enable the Federal government to

continue these efforts so that the U.S. education and training system can once again be first in the world. The Administration also remains committed to working with Congress to make the Early Learning Challenge Fund a reality. This proposal, if enacted, would challenge States to establish model systems of early learning and ensure that more children enter school ready to learn and succeed.”

¨ Seth Harris , Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC

Harris's presentation emphasized job training, work place readiness, including the Workforce Investment Act that serves both in-school and out-of-school youth with access to tutoring, alternative secondary school service, mentoring, supportive services, etc. Also indicated the importance of the Family and Medical Leave Act is essential to support families.

Noted that via Good Jobs for Everyone workers acquire skills for the future. "The Secretary's vision of Good Jobs for Everyone includes ensuring that young people have access to careers in high growth industries and the skills they need to compete in the global economy. This vision aligns With your determination, Mr. Chairman, to improve life opportunities for our children and youth. In due time, children become adults and have their own children. Putting these young adults on a track to gainful, skilled employment early in life is the best way to ensure not only their own success, but the future success of their children. Research suggests paid work experience may improve educational and employment outcomes for at-risk youth.”

"Under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), the Department administers Youth

Activities funds allocated to state and local areas to deliver a comprehensive array of youth

workforce investment activities. These activities help ensure that youth obtain the skills and

knowledge needed to succeed in a knowledge-based economy, and emerging industry sectors

such as healthcare and "green” jobs. WIA authorizes services to low-income youth, ages 14 to

21, who experience barriers to employment. Many eligible young people are deficient in basic

skills, and are frequently homeless, runaways, pregnant or parenting, criminal offenders, school

dropouts, or foster children.”

¨ David A. Hansell , Acting Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families,

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington

Emphasized the need for high quality early childhood services: "As we move forward we have goals for early childhood programs including improving the quality of child care and Head Start programs, fostering the integration of Ace's early childhood programs with other early learning programs and social services, vertically aligning programs wit the elementary and secondary education system and strengthening program integrity. Using the Child Care and Development Blocks Grants mandatory four percent quality set-aside we are helping States build a systematic framework for quality investments. This effort includes taking actions to strengthen the quality of child care programs by expanding the number of State with Quality Rating and improvement Systems (QRIS). Noted the close relationship of Secretary Sebelius and Secretary Duncan to improve early childhood education from birth to 8.

¨ Thelma Meléndez de Santa Ana , Assistant Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary

Education, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC

Melendez noted that high quality early learning programs and services are so important to ensuring equity and "…excellence for a child's educational future. Studies show that at least half of the achievement gap between poor and more affluent children already exists when they enter kindergarten. The larger the gap, the harder it is to close later on. That is why the Administration's fiscal year 2011 budget request included $9.3 billion over ten years for the Early Learning Challenge Fund, to support and encourage States to reform and raise the bar across their early learning settings. Many in Congress worked to include the Early Learning Challenge Fund in the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act earlier this year. We remain committed to working with Congress to advance funding for this important initiative in fiscal year 2011.

"Research also tells us that teachers are the most important in-school factor in student success, but access to effective teachers is not equal. We all know that high-poverty and high-minority schools are being short-changed – often being taught by less experienced, less well-prepared, and less effective teachers. We need to make sure that the best teachers teach where they are needed the most. We want to spur the creation of more effective pathways for preparation of teachers, meaningful career ladders and stronger efforts to retain great teachers, and we want to support educators in their instructional practice and reward them for all they do. Our proposal will provide funds to develop and support effective teachers and leaders and make sure that every child has the opportunity to learn from excellent teachers.

"In order to address the greatest achievement gaps and the lowest graduation rates, our proposal drives efforts and resources to our lowest performing schools. We have set a goal of turning around 5,000 of our lowest performing schools – the bottom 5 percent in each State in the country. These are schools where achievement has been low for years and isn't improving. Many of these schools produce a disproportionate percentage of our high school dropouts. In fact, fewer than 15 percent of all high schools, about 2,000 schools, produce a majority of our nation's dropouts and approximately two-thirds of Latino and African American dropouts.”

¨ Howard K. Koh, MD , Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC detailed the programs addressing family health issues including:

"Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Prior to the authorization of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program in 2000 (under the Children's Health Act), less than half of the infants in the U.S. were being screened for hearing loss. CDC's EHDI program provides support on the development and implementation of state-level tracking and surveillance systems to ensure that infants and children with hearing loss are identified early and receive services as soon as possible. Collaborative work with state EHDI programs and other partners to ensure infants receive recommended follow-up diagnostic and intervention services in a timely manner to realize the benefits of newborn hearing screening.”

Sen. Dodd referenced this new report:

RATES OF CHILDREN IN POVERTY ALREADY ON THE RISE BEFORE RECESSION BEGAN - Casey Foundation Releases 2010 KIDS COUNT Data Book

According to data released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation in its 2010 KIDS COUNT Data Book, overall improvements in child well-being that began in the late 1990s stalled in the years just before the current economic downturn. The 21st annualKIDS COUNT Data Bookprofiles thestatus of America's children on a national and state-by-state basis and ranks states on 10 measures of well-being. Read thenational news releaseto learn more about how kids are faring and visit theData Centerto find state rankings and to create your own maps, graphs, and charts.

Sen. Dodd's questions mostly concerned level of coordination between agencies for strategizing and developing and maintaining programs aimed at early learning through work age continuum.

Deputy Secretary Harris notes more is being done under Obama administration but could do more data sharing and creating of more shared data bases.

Sen. Dodd's question: parental involvement and home visits

Assistant Secretary Melendez's answer- Transition from pre-K to school requires more parental involvement; home visit programs help.

Sen. Dodd: wants examples of successful home visit programs to be shared

Sen. Dodd also wants expansion of after school programs that take advantage of the learning opportunities during that time.

Much discussion of health, obesity, smoking, and unemployment issues and effect on families long term.

Deputy Secretary Harris wants to integrate activity and health issues into all programs for kids

Sen. Casey – Wants better ways to report on the successful programs of all agencies and have them packaged and reported in an organized way so citizens and Congress can know how well they programs are working. We need a national strategy we are clear about.

Sen. Casey asked panel, "How we can put a strategy in place?”

Deputy Secretary Harris— More time talking about how programs improve lives and use this info to innovate and improve program itself.

Assistant Secretary Koh— Need businesses to support this strategy; need to figure out how to let general population know the results of these programs.

Sen. Dodd's question to Deputy Secretary Harris- When will there be another national survey of the status of youth?

Deputy Secretary Harris's answer: No funding for full survey, but in June 2011 will release a new survey on young adults.

This post has not been tagged.

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Senate Appropriations Committee Summary

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Friday, July 30, 2010

Department of Education: FY 2010 ...                        President's Request   ....Senate Committee

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies

$14,492,401

$14,492,401

$14,942,401

Early Learning Challenge Fund

$0

$0

$300,000

School Improvement Grants

$545,633

$900,000

$625,000

Striving Readers

$250,000

***

$250,000

High School Graduation Initiative

$50,000

***

$100,000

Impact Aid

$1,276,183

$1,276,183

$1,296,183

Teacher Quality State Grants

$2,947,749

***

$2,954,673

Teacher Incentive Fund

$400,000

***

$400,000

Charter Schools Grants

$256,031

***

$256,031

Promise Neighborhoods

$10,000

$210,000

$20,000

English Language Acquisition

$750,000

$800,000

$800,000

21st Century Community Learning Centers

$1,166,166

$1,166,166

$1,266,166

Safe and Healthy Schools National Activities

$191,341

***

$196,341

Education Technology State Grants

$100,000

***

$100,000

Education for Homeless Children and Youth

$65,427

$65,427

$75,427

Race to the Top

$0

$1,350,000

$675,000

Investing in Innovation

$0

$500,000

$250,000

School Leadership

$29,220

***

$41,220

Special Ed - Grants to States Part B, Sec 611

$11,505,211

$11,755,211

$11,925,211

Special Ed - Grants for Infants and Families

$439,427

$439,427

$459,427

ED WIA Innovation Fund

$0

$60,000

$57,000

Pell Grants - maximum award

$5,550

$5,710

$5,550

TRIO

$853,089

$853,089

$868,089

GEAR UP

$323,212

$323,212

$323,212

Institute of Education Sciences

$659,006

$738,756

$722,756


Tags:  Funding 

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Update on ESEA & Funding

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Friday, July 23, 2010

Last night the Senate failed to include the Ed Jobs provisions in the supplemental appropriations request.  They sent the measure back to the House without it.  Where does this leave the now $10 billion dollar provision?  Basically now the House would have to reassert it and hope that the Senate agrees to it or not.  The problem is that the supplemental also includes provisions to support the troops in Afganistan and Iraq that have been called critical by the Secretary of Defense. 

During the week of July 26th, the Senate subcommittee on Appropriations for the Departments of Labor/Health and Human Services/Education is scheduled to mark up its spending plan for FY 2011 on Tuesday July 27th.  The Senate Subcommittee on Children and Families is holding a hearing on the state of the American child on Thursday July 29th.

Meanwhile reports of drafting of a new ESEA continue to be quietly heard.  One report is that there will be a draft in the House by the end of July.  What isn't being heard is whether this draft will be for public review or how complete it might be.

This post has not been tagged.

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 

School Districts’ Perspectives on the Economic Stimulus Package: Teaching Jobs Saved in 2009-10 But Teacher Layoffs Loom for Next School Year

Posted By Richard Long, National Title I Association, Friday, July 16, 2010

(July 15, 2010)   The Center on Education Policy released the results from a spring of 2010 survey of a nationally representative sample of school districts. The purpose of the survey was to learn about districts’ fiscal situation and how American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds have impacted them over the last year. CEP found that while the federal funds helped districts save or create teaching jobs and stabilize budgets, most districts expected to layoff teachers in the 2010-11 school year. The report also addresses districts’ efforts to carryout ARRA’s four reform areas, district uses of State Fiscal Stabilization Funds and supplemental Title I and IDEA funds, and problems faced by districts in implementing ARRA. School Districts’ Perspectives on the Economic Stimulus Package: Teaching Jobs Saved in 2009-10 But Teacher Layoffs Loom for Next School Year is posted on the CEP Web site (http://www.cep-dc.org/) under "What’s New” and can be downloaded free-of-charge.

http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document_ext.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=312

 

 

This post has not been tagged.

Bookmark and Share
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 1 of 4
1  |  2  |  3  |  4
Sign In

Username

Password

Forgot your password?

Haven't registered yet?

Calendar